HIPAA: HHS ISSUE GUIDANCE FOR HEALTH INFORMATION ORGANIZATIONS (HIOS)

HIOs and Regional Health Information Networks (RHINs) are being created to facilitate the exchange of information among providers. HIOs and RHINs are typically not statutorily governed by HIPAA, other than perhaps as Business Associates. The HHS guidance, issued in conjunction with The Nationwide Privacy and Security Framework for Electronic Exchange of Individually Identifiable Health Information, covers HIPPA issues in the following six areas:

1.         Data correction

2.         Openness and transparency

3.         Individual choice

4.         Collection use and disclosure

5.         Data safeguards

6.         Accountability

 

Link: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/hit/.

OIG ISSUES ANOTHER GAINSHARING ADVISSORY OPINION (08/21)

OIG issues another in a string of gainsharing opinions involving hospitals and groups of cardiologists and radiologists. This and the solicitation by HHS of comments on shared savings exceptions and safe harbors confirm HHS's intent to continue to encourage legitimate cost savings and incentive programs.

Link: http://www.oig.hhs.gov/fraud/docs/advisorgopinions/2008/AdvOpn08-21.2.pdf.

 

BREACH OF HCQIA PRECLUDES IMMUNITY DESPITE BYLAW COMPLIANCE

A Colorado state appeals court concluded breach of due process provisions of the Health Care Quality Immunity Act (HCQIA) precluded immunity for St. Mary's Hospital and MedicalCenter, even though the medical staff bylaws might not have required notice and a fair hearing for revocation of provisional clinical privileges.

The hospital's medical staff bylaws provided no due process procedures regarding provisional privileges, and the hospital argued on summary judgments that it was entitled to HCQIA immunity. Although the trial court agreed, the state appellate court overruled and held that compliance with the bylaws is irrelevant regarding HCQIA immunity.

 

The full opinion is available at http://op.bna.com/hl.nsf/r?Open=mapi-7mcrs6.

Federal Court Requires Production of Peer Review Documents

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma has required Ardent Health Services to produce unredacted documents relating to the files of identified peer review physicians who practiced at the hospitals in order to examine whether the plaintiff's peer review situation was handled differently than other physicians within the hospital. 

The Court held that the Oklahoma statutory peer review privilege does not apply in this case and that the applicable test is Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(b)(1), i.e. relevance, and the corresponding provisions of Rule 26(b)(2)(c) pertaining to burdensome, expense, and likely value. 

 

A copy of the opinion is attached at the link below.

 

http://op.bna.com/hl.nsf/id/psts-7ljnar/$File/cohl.pdf

USCIS Revises Employment Eligibility Verification Form

 WASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that it has submitted to the Federal Register an interim final rule that will streamline the Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9) process.....

To read more about this article click link below:
www.medlawblog.com/uploads/file/I-9 update Dec 2008.pdf

Pennsylvania Medical Record Fees for 2009

On Saturday, December 6, 2008, Pennsylvania Secretary of Health published the allowable medical records fees under Pennsylvania Statute 42 P.A. C.S. §§ 6152-6155. Attached below is a link to the notice published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.

http://www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol38/38-51/2302.html

 

 

Visa Waiver Program countries must check with Electronic System for Travel Authorization

Please be advised that effective January 12, 2009, elgibile citizens or nationals from ALL Visa Waiver Program Countries must obtain approval through ESTA (The Electronic System for Travel Authorization) prior to traveling to the United States under the Visa Waiver Program.

For information regarding whether an e-Passport is required, a list of Visa Waiver Program countries, and digital photograph requirements, please see:
 
 
In order to apply for authorization to travel under the visa waiver program, please see:
 

Lisa Ventresca

Health FSA Debit Cards - Deadline To Comply Has Been Extended

 

The January 1, 2009 deadline for bringing health flexible spending accounts (“health FSAs”) into compliance with the IRS's new debit card rules has been extended to July 1, 2009

In short, in 2007, the IRS issued guidance stating that, starting on January 1, 2009, participants could use health FSA debit cards to pay for eligible expenses at certain types of stores. Specifically, if a store falls within a pre-determined category code of "drug stores and pharmacies merchant", a health FSA debit card could be used in that store only if (i) the store participates in a type of inventory information approval system described by the IRS in already-issued guidance or (ii) at least 90% of the store’s gross receipts (determined on a store by store basis) during the prior tax year consisted of items which qualify as deductible medical expenses on a personal income tax return (including certain types of nonprescription medications). Participants may now continue using health FSA debit cards under the old rules until June 30, 2009. Then, starting as of July 1, 2009, the IRS’s new debit card rules will apply.

If you have any questions or need assistance in evaluating your company's health FSA or benefit arrangements, please contact  the Tucker Arensberg attorney with whom you regularly work.


Employee Benefits Law Group: The  Employee Benefits Law Group at Tucker Arensberg, P.C. has a diverse client base of private and public employers.  We are dedicated to working with our clients to resolve complicated legal issues in a practical, common-sense and cost-efficient manner.  In doing so, we routinely work with our clients to design, establish, implement, administer, and terminate many different types of employee benefit plans. Refer to http://www.tuckerlaw.com/practice/employee.html for more information on the Employee Benefits Law Group.

TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: Any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by you for the purpose of (1) avoiding any penalty that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you would like such advice, please contact us.

MEDICARE RESOURCES FOR ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSES

CMS has established a Medicare learning network web page dedicated to Medicare fee for services advance practice nurses and physician assistants. It includes definitions, licensing requirements, enrollment procedures, reimbursement guidelines, and links to related materials. The website is accessible at the following link:

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNProducts/70_APNPA.asp

HIGHMARK DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING PRIVILEGING REQUIREMENTS

Highmark has established new provider privileging requirements from diagnostic imaging to be effective January 1, 2009. The text of the requirements is available on the Highmark website in the ResourceCenter and is also attached below as a PDF.

www.medlawblog.com/uploads/file/Privileging Requirements.pdf

IDTF Medicare Changes for 2009

 

Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility Developments

 

            The 2009 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Regulations include two provisions regarding Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities. 42 CFR §410.33 has been supplemented with two additional subsections.

            First, Section (16) states all entities that provide diagnostic imaging services to Medicare beneficiaries will be required to enroll as IDTFs regardless of whether the services furnished are mobile or from a fixed base location. 

            Second, Section (17) requires registered Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities to bill directly for all mobile diagnostic services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries, unless the mobile diagnostic service is part of a hospital service provided under arrangements with that hospital. This clarifies that IDTFs may not provide services under arrangements to non-hospital entities, such as physician practices. 

Medicare 2009 Anti-Markup Rules

The revised Anti-Markup Final Rules were published by CMS on November 19, 2008 in the Federal Register, as part of the Medicare 2009 Physician Fee Schedule. The entire text of the 2009 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and the related rules, i.e. Anti-Markup, Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility, physician referral issues, etc. were posted by the Med Law Blog on November 21, 2008. The 2009 Anti-Markup Rules are a simpler version of the 2008 and 2007 proposals. Rather than defining the details of purchased technical components and purchased professional components, based upon the location and employment status of the physicians and technicians, CMS has stated that the Anti-Markup Rules will apply to diagnostic tests [as defined in Social Security §1861(s)(3),] ordered by the billing physician or supplier, or by a related party [as defined by CFR §413.17] unless the test is performed by a physician who shares the practice with the billing physician or supplier.

2009 Anti-Markup Rules

 

 

 

The financial provisions of the 2009 Anti-Markup Rules provide that compliant arrangements may bill globally for the full physician fee schedule amount but noncompliant transactions will be paid the lowest of the following:

(a) the billing physician or suppliers net cost to purchase the diagnostic test;

(b) the actual charge to the patient/beneficiary; or

(c) the Physician Fee Schedule amount.

The technical components of the tests are deemed to be performed by the physician who supervises the performance of the technical components (as defined in 42 CFR §410.32) and the professional component is performed by the interpreting physician. Note that the supervision requirements of §410.32 are independent of the supervision requirements imposed upon Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities (IDTFs) and that CMS has decided that physician entities and organizations performing diagnostic tests need not register as Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities in 2009.

 

There are two categories of shared practice, i.e. substantial services and same office.

First, CMS defines a shared practices as a situation in which a performing physician furnishes substantially all of his professional services (which is defined as at least 75% of the total professional services provided by that physician to coincide with the substantially all definitions of the physicians self-referral regulations) through the billing physician or other supplier. This "substantially all" test can be measured either prospectively or retrospectively, so that it will be satisfied if the billing physician or other supplier has a reasonable belief that either:

(a) for the twelve months prior to and including the month in which the service was performed, the performing physician furnished substantially all of his or her professional services through the billing physician or supplier; or

(b) the performing physician will furnish substantially all of his or her professional services through the billing physician or other supplier for the next twelve months, including the month in which the service is performed.

Note that this arrangement will not prohibit temporary or locum tenens arrangements, because under locum tenens arrangements the services of the substitute physician will be billed in the name of the billing physician whom that substitute physician is replacing.

Second, a physician will also be deemed to share a practice with the billing physician or other supplier if the physician i s an owner, employee or independent contractor of the billing physician or other supplier and the technical component or the professional component is performed in the office of the billing physician or other supplier. The "office of the billing physician" is any medical office space, regardless of number of locations, in which the ordering physician regularly furnishes patient care, it includes space where the billing physician furnishes diagnostic testing if the space in located in the same building in which the ordering physician regularly furnishes patient care. Note that the "same building" is defined by §411.351 of the Physician's Self-Referral Regulations.

The same office requirement eliminates the need to measure the relative professional services of the performing physician. The performing physician could provide services to multiple physician practices, without regard to the substantially all test, so long as the performed services are performed in the office of the billing physician. Although this would eliminate the use of a centralized building to provide diagnostic tests, it would not eliminate arrangements known as "pod laboratories" for multiple practices, provided all of the pod laboratories are located in the same building in which those other practices regularly perform patient services.

The effective date of the 2009 Anti-Markup Provisions will be January 1, 2009.

Shared Practices

 

General Rules