 |
The board of the Texas Medical Liability Trust recently approved an average rate reduction of 4.7
The Department of Health and Human Services and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published final Stark IV regulations in the Federal Register on August 19, 2008. The web link is ttp://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-17914.htm. The final regulations cover issues in addition to physician self-referral. Three issues of particular interest are the per-click compensation arrangements, the Stand-in-shoes regulations,
Check David Harlow’s HealthBlawg ( http://healthblawg.typepad.com/) for a discussion of OIG Advisory Opinion 08-10, finding that a block leasing aggreement would be a prohibited joint venture.
On August 22, 2008 the Department of Health and Human Services published a Proposed Rule that would modify two of the medical data code set standards adopted in the Transactions and Code Sets final rule. The Proposed Rule would modify the standard code sets for coding diagnoses and inpatient hospital procedures by concurrently adopting
Physicians initiating peer review litigation should be careful of two issues involving attorney’s fees. First, Section 42 USC 11113 of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act provides that hospitals may recover attorney’s fees from physicians who file frivolous or bad faith claims.
Second, sometimes the application for medical staff privileges contains clauses providing the immunity
1. Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. The sustainable growth rate (SGR) automatic physician compensation reduction of -10.6% was retroactively replaced with a .5% increase, essentially maintaining the .5% conversion factor increase implemented for January-June 2008.
2. Incentive Payments. Extends through 2010 incentive payments for implementation of electronic prescription systems (EPS).
3. Medicare Advantage Plan.
The CMS Medical Learning Network ("MLN") has posted an Evaluation and Management Services Guide for billing and coding. The Guide is a useful explanation of this complicated area and provides links to the 1995 and 1997 Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation and Management Services, as well as the Medicare Claims Processing Manual and the Current Procedure Terminology
A California court has held that one hospital cannot take adverse peer review actions against a physician based solely on adverse peer review actions at another hospital; there must be an independent investigation of the medical issues.
In Smith vs. Selma Community Hospital, a copy of the opinion is attached below, the California appellate court
An Appellate Court in Tennessee recently held that a medical practice can enforce a medical noncompete agreement with a certified orthotist who took a job with a competitor due to the protectable interest that the practice had in the training that they provided to the employee who then acquired a specialized skill. The Court also
I would like to thank all of the subscribers and users of the Medlaw Blog. July 2008 was a record setting month for the Medlaw Blog. We had more than 5,300 visits. We appreciate the support and welcome any suggestions you might have for content that you would like to see on Medlaw Blog.